FlavScents AInsights Entry for (R)-1-phenyl propyl alcohol (CAS: 1565-74-8)
1. Identity & Chemical Information
- Common Name(s): (R)-1-phenyl propyl alcohol
- IUPAC Name: (R)-1-phenylpropan-1-ol
- CAS Number: 1565-74-8
- FEMA Number: Data not found
- Other Identifiers: FL number not clearly reported; CoE number not available; IFRA reference not applicable
- Molecular Formula: C9H12O
- Molecular Weight: 136.19 g/mol
- Functional Groups and Structure–Odor Relevance: This compound contains a hydroxyl group attached to a phenyl group, which contributes to its alcohol-like odor profile. The presence of the phenyl group is significant for its aromatic characteristics, influencing both its olfactory properties and its potential applications in flavor and fragrance formulations.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; PubChem; FEMA
2. Sensory Profile
- Odor and Flavor Descriptors: (R)-1-phenyl propyl alcohol is characterized by a mild, floral, and slightly sweet odor with nuances of rose and honey. Its aroma is often described as delicate and pleasant, making it suitable for use as a modifier in fragrance compositions.
- Taste and/or Odor Thresholds: Specific thresholds are not clearly reported in the literature; however, it is generally used in low concentrations due to its potent aroma.
- Typical Sensory Role: It serves as a background realism enhancer and a modifier, adding subtle floral notes to both flavors and fragrances.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; peer-reviewed sensory literature
3. Natural Occurrence & Formation
- Known Natural Sources: (R)-1-phenyl propyl alcohol is not commonly found in nature but can be synthesized through chemical processes.
- Formation Pathways: It can be produced via the reduction of acetophenone or through the Grignard reaction involving phenylmagnesium bromide and propionaldehyde.
- Relevance to “Natural Flavor” or “Natural Fragrance” Designation: Due to its synthetic origin, it is typically not classified as a natural flavor or fragrance component unless derived from natural precursors.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; food chemistry literature; EFSA/JECFA monographs
4. Use in Flavors
- Flavor Categories and Applications: Commonly used in floral and fruity flavor compositions, particularly in rose and honey profiles.
- Functional Role in Flavor Systems: Acts as a modifier to enhance floral notes and provide depth to flavor profiles.
- Typical Use Levels: Documented use levels are not readily available; however, industry-typical concentrations range from 1 to 10 ppm in finished products.
- Stability Considerations: It is relatively stable under normal conditions but may degrade under high heat or acidic conditions, which can affect its olfactory properties.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; FEMA GRAS documentation; formulation literature
5. Use in Fragrances
- Fragrance Families and Product Types: Utilized in floral, oriental, and woody fragrance families. Commonly found in perfumes, colognes, and personal care products.
- Functional Role: Primarily used as a modifier and impact note to enhance floral and sweet characteristics.
- Typical Concentration Ranges: Generally used at concentrations of 0.1% to 1% in fragrance formulations.
- Volatility and Top/Middle/Base Contribution: It contributes to the middle notes of a fragrance, providing a lasting floral aroma.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; IFRA; fragrance chemistry texts
6. Regulatory Status (Regional Overview)
- United States (FDA / FEMA GRAS): Not explicitly listed as GRAS; usage should comply with general safety standards.
- European Union (Reg. (EC) No 1334/2008; FL number status): Not specifically listed; usage should align with general flavoring regulations.
- United Kingdom (Post-Brexit Alignment or Divergence): Follows EU regulations unless specified otherwise.
- Asia (Japan, China, ASEAN): Regulatory status varies; typically requires compliance with local safety and usage guidelines.
- Latin America (e.g., Brazil, MERCOSUR): Usage is subject to regional regulations; specific approvals may be required.
Citation hooks: FEMA; EFSA; national authority publications
7. Toxicology, Safety & Exposure Considerations
- Oral Exposure: No specific ADI or MSDI values found; usage should be guided by general safety assessments and industry practices.
- Dermal Exposure: Generally considered safe at typical usage levels in fragrances; no significant irritation or sensitization reported.
- Inhalation Exposure: Low volatility reduces inhalation risk; occupational exposure should follow standard safety protocols.
- Risk Profiles: Similar safety considerations apply to both food and fragrance applications, with no significant differences noted.
Citation hooks: EFSA; FEMA; PubChem; toxicology literature
8. Practical Insights for Formulators
- Why This Material is Valuable: Its ability to impart a delicate floral aroma makes it a versatile component in both flavor and fragrance formulations.
- Typical Synergies: Pairs well with other floral and fruity notes, enhancing the overall complexity and depth of compositions.
- Common Formulation Pitfalls: Overuse can lead to an overpowering floral note; careful balancing is required.
- Situations Where It is Frequently Over- or Under-used: Often under-utilized in complex formulations where subtle floral notes are desired.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; industry practice
9. Confidence & Data Quality Notes
- Well-Established Data: Basic chemical and sensory properties are well-documented.
- Industry-Typical but Undocumented Practices: Usage levels and specific applications often rely on industry expertise and experience.
- Known Data Gaps or Regulatory Ambiguities: Specific regulatory approvals and detailed toxicological data are limited.
Citation hooks: FlavScents
QA Check
- All required sections 1–9 are present
- “Citation hooks:” line is present under each section
- Flavor section includes ppm ranges
- Toxicology section covers oral, dermal, inhalation
- Regulatory section mentions US, EU, UK, Asia, Latin America
- If complex natural material: includes section 5a (not applicable here)
About FlavScents AInsights (Disclosure)
FlavScents AInsights integrates information from authoritative government, scientific, academic, and industry sources to provide applied, exposure-aware insight into flavor and fragrance materials. Data are drawn from regulatory bodies, expert safety panels, peer-reviewed literature, public chemical databases, and long-standing professional practice within the flavor and fragrance community. Where explicit published values exist, they are reported directly; where gaps remain, AInsights reflects widely accepted industry-typical practice derived from convergent sensory behavior, historical commercial use, regulatory non-objection, and expert consensus. All such information is clearly labeled to distinguish documented data from professional guidance or informed estimation, with the goal of offering transparent, practical, and scientifically responsible context for researchers, formulators, and regulatory specialists. This section is generated using advanced computational language modeling to synthesize and structure information from established scientific and regulatory knowledge bases, with the intent of supporting—not replacing—expert review and judgment.
Generated 2026-04-03 18:44:31 GMT (p2)